The Supreme Court has expressed strong disapproval of the government’s prioritization of free schemes over addressing the salaries and pensions of district court judges. Highlighting the growing trend of offering free electricity, water, education, and monthly allowances in several states, the court noted that such measures often serve electoral gains but neglect critical administrative needs.
A bench headed by Justice BR Gavai made these observations while hearing a 2015 petition filed by the All India Judges Association, which raised concerns over low salaries and inadequate pensions for judges. The court remarked that while governments seem to have ample funds for schemes like “Ladli Behin,” which promises ₹2,500 per month to beneficiaries, they cite financial constraints when it comes to judicial remuneration.
Attorney General R. Venkataramani, representing the central government, defended the free schemes, calling them temporary arrangements compared to the long-term impact of salary and pension revisions. He emphasized the need to balance such increases with revenue considerations.
The Supreme Court has appointed senior advocate K. V. Viswanathan as amicus curiae to assist in resolving the issue. The petition also highlights the absence of a nationwide policy on judicial salaries and pensions, adding to the urgency of the matter.
The criticism coincides with promises of financial aid in election campaigns. In Delhi, political parties have announced cash transfer schemes targeting women voters. The Aam Aadmi Party’s “Mahila Samman Yojana” offers ₹2,100 monthly allowances, while Congress proposes the “Pari Didi Yojana,” promising ₹2,500 over five months.
The court’s remarks shed light on the broader implications of the so-called “freebie culture” and its potential impact on governance. The judges called for a more balanced approach, ensuring essential sectors like the judiciary are adequately funded while addressing public welfare needs.